Additional Content 1234567891011 Last »
FM Diversion and Dam Increases national debt

Archive for Oppose | Opposed | Opposition to the Fargo Moorhead Dam and Diversion

You are browsing the archives of Oppose | Opposed | Opposition to the Fargo Moorhead Dam and Diversion.

Letter: Forum Editorial Shows Clear Lack of Integrity

Letter: Forum Editorial Shows Clear Lack of Integrity

I urge The Forum to please try to save your last bits of journalistic integrity and publish the facts and not propagate propaganda. I realize that in an editorial, you can say what you want without facts backing your position.

Richland County Water Resource District Comments to the USACE EA Document re: Fargo Dam and FM Diversion

Richland County Water Resource District Comments to the USACE EA Document re: Fargo Dam and FM Diversion

The Richland County Water Resource Board feels the United State Army Corps of Engineers did not adequately review the concept of building smaller retention sites in lieu of the large staging area created by the dam.

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties August 1st, 2013

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties August 1st, 2013

Fargo needs plan C: Quit building in the floodplain. Build your dikes to 43.5 feet and get out of FEMA insurance requirements. Invest in basinwide retention to give protection beyond the 100-year flood level. Moorhead should be congratulated for getting their city safe from spring floods.

Ignorance, Indifference, Intolerance

Ignorance, Indifference, Intolerance

When the 3 a.m. summer storm comes knocking on Bakke, Hickson and Oxbow’s door with 10-20 inches of rain filling the ring-dike, who will come with the body bags to float the dead away?

PR Poppycock from Pawluk

PR Poppycock from Pawluk

Is it the remainder of Cass County, State of North Dakota or United States taxpayers fault that Fargo methodically develops a flood prone flood plain?

“You can fool some of the people all of the time—“

“’The people who have no data are winning the argument.’ says Clay County Commissioner Kevin Campbell.”

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties February 7th, 2013

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties February 7th, 2013

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: “Impacts outside the areas Fargo decided to compensate, designated as the “staging area,” will be evaluated on a “taking” basis. This is just code for “we’re not going to pay for any impacts until/unless you sue us and prove we caused it.”

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties January 31st, 2013

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties January 31st, 2013

Cass County Commissioner and Diversion Authority Chair Daryl Vanyo: “you wouldn’t have anything out here if it wasn’t for Fargo.”

Empty Promises from the Diversion Authority

Empty Promises from the Diversion Authority

What good is a promise to build a ring dike when the Diversion Authority fully intends to stick the victims with the price tag?

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties January 17th, 2013

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties January 17th, 2013

Not many people are interested in buying property that may be condemned in the near future. But the flower throwers say the greatest benefit is that property values will return as soon as the sound of backhoes is heard piling up the Red River Valley clay around them.

Page 1 of 1712345678910...Last »