Additional Content 1234567891011 Last »
FM Diversion and Dam Increases national debt

Archive for Fargo Dam

You are browsing the archives of Fargo Dam.

Cass County Joint Water Resource District Chairman Mark Brodshaug Uses Seat to Mislead

Cass County Joint Water Resource District Chairman Mark Brodshaug Uses Seat to Mislead

In yet another attempt to do Fargo Dam and FM Diversion damage control, Fargo sacrifices another pawn upon the blade of credibility.

A Wasteful Flood Study

A Wasteful Flood Study

Just like the previous efforts, this study has been done with tax dollars and has fallen to the divisive politics of special interests. Perhaps the answer they got was not the answer the Diversion Authority wanted?

Richland County Water Resource District Comments to the USACE EA Document re: Fargo Dam and FM Diversion

Richland County Water Resource District Comments to the USACE EA Document re: Fargo Dam and FM Diversion

The Richland County Water Resource Board feels the United State Army Corps of Engineers did not adequately review the concept of building smaller retention sites in lieu of the large staging area created by the dam.

Widespread Community Support Against the Fargo Dam

Widespread Community Support Against the Fargo Dam

Sunday night, with money in their hands, they came to Christine to preserve their communities and their future.

Cartoon Gallery

Cartoon Gallery

Cartoon Gallery relating to the Fargo Dam and FM Diversion.

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties September 12th, 2013

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties September 12th, 2013

Cooking the books to grab land. Fargo, Cass, the Fargo Diversion Authority and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers artificially inflate future land values in an attempt to justify a massive land grab of the last natural flood plain adjacent to the city.

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties September 5th, 2013

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties September 5th, 2013

Are Moorhead leaders that bow to Fargo ND pressure serving their constituents responsibly? Should Moorhead abandon the Diversion Authority and focus on economic growth for Moorhead MN? Fargo has crossed the line that divides a neighbor in need from a demanding bully. Isn’t it time for Moorhead, Clay County and Minnesota to step back and take a strong look at Fargo’s agenda, and evaluate whether the clear lack of benefit justifies the impacts and costs to Minnesota residents.

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties August 29th, 2013

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties August 29th, 2013

A false choice is again being served up: “cooperate with the ring dike details or we’ll build it without your cooperation.”

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties August 22nd, 2013

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties August 22nd, 2013

Fargo has more than $200 million in cash from the state of North Dakota, and receives more than $30 million a year from sales tax, and yet they have to build a clay dike in front of their City Hall if the Valley gets a heavy rain. Moorhead can take $100 million from the state of Minnesota and get 100-year flood protection, but Fargo has to take 50,000 acres from the folks south of town to get theirs

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties August 15th, 2013

Defending Richland and Wilkin counties August 15th, 2013

The other residents from Bakke and Hickson were asked to vote whether they would agree to a ring dike. After they overwhelmingly voted no, Fargo leaders decided to ignore their votes. Now the only votes that count are the 61 from Oxbow. There are 190 residences that will be encircled.

Page 5 of 1912345678910...Last »