P3 Financing Funding the Fargo Dam and FM Diversion Project
Why would any P3/PPP lender with any common sense borrow money to a project that is already operating in the red?
Continue ReadingFargo Moorhead Diversion Authority Monitor | An Independent News Organization
Why would any P3/PPP lender with any common sense borrow money to a project that is already operating in the red?
Continue ReadingThis is really an incestuous story of participants that “wear many hats” in a quasi-state of conflict of interest and treat the hats like some sort of split personality in a feigned attempt to justify their actions.
Continue ReadingIt is beyond acting in bad faith; indeed, the continuation of construction is an insult to collaboration.
Continue ReadingThe USACE (trouble-making playmates) has consistently agitated and mislead Fargo et al., into kicking sand in Minnesota’s face and wails when they are told “NO”.
Continue ReadingThere is no “federal project”. This is a local project encumbered by states rights issue, wherein, Fargo, ND wants to push its water problems onto Minnesota and MN said “NO”.
Continue ReadingFEMA does not require over 96 percent of Oxbow, ND to carry flood insurance, Oxbow property owners (if they truly felt they were “flood prone”) would be purchasing FEMA flood insurance policies to protect their interests…, right?
Continue ReadingFargo’s greatest LIARS insist the proposed project is a “federal” project. Then it certainly begs the question, why is a NON-ELECTED water board skulking around with an attempt to sneak the USACE in through the back door and grant access to private properties outside the jurisdictional boundaries of Cass County?
Continue ReadingMinnesota will ask the court to prohibit construction of the dam and diversion channel because the Minnesota has not issued the necessary permits.
Continue ReadingSo what did the taxpayer get for their $78.5+ million spent thus far?
Continue ReadingSince the Diversion Authority declined to consider a more modest project alternative, the only options included for consideration in the permit application were the “No Action” and “No Action with Emergency Measures” alternatives. This left the DNR with two choices: 1) permit the project or 2) deny the project.
Continue Reading